Book Review: “The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind: Creating Currents of Electricity and Hope” by William Kamkwamba and Bryan Mealer

William Kamkwamba endured a year-long famine and survived but dropped out of secondary school due to lack of money. Recovering from the famine and not being able to go school, he took advantage of the free time and a small library and educated himself about power generation. Through his scavenger around the dump site, he created a windmill to power a 12V light-bulbs so that he could study and catch up with the class mates. More importantly, he wanted to use the windmill to pump water and irrigate the farms so that they will never have another famine and be hungry.

This memoir gives me a pretty idea of what it’s like to be living as farmers in Africa. They’re constantly under the threat of cyclical weather and natural elements like pests, but mostly from the corruption and incompetence of the government, who allowed its citizens to die of hunger without recognizing and owning the problem and Malawi is a very small country of only 14M people and 46K sq miles.

The famine story was especially gut wrenching. Hopefully, no one will have to go through that again in this world of abundance. The author’s hunger for knowledge and the tenacity to reach his goal of building the windmill should be inspiring to anyone. And anyone who complains life is hard in the United States or other developed countries should walk in his shoes for a while to appreciate how good of lives we live.

William got his fame from his participation in TED. As a result, he got all the attentions, gifts and help from people all over the world. Is this a beginning of the recognition that Africans may have what it takes to take themselves out of poverty, or is it just another western news-craze way to get the top story of the day and then move on? I hope it’s the former and William took advantage of that to get himself on the right track to become a future leader of Malawi.

Also, William got a true friend in Gilbert, the chief’s son, who funded his project without hesitation and bought into his dream and supported him throughout. That’s true friendship. It’s good to know that William was able to repay him in return in Gilbert’s time of need.

This book is educational to all in the Western world that only heard and read about the Africans’ plight remotely. It drilled deep into the humanity in us to want to help and avoid the next famine for our fellow humans. It’s also hopeful to see there are Africans like William who take responsibility to make changes and refuse to be another victim. Good story!

Movie Review “Dolphin Tale”

Unlike other dolphin or whale movie, this movie played the handicap angle very well. So a dolphin was beached and tangled in the wires of crab trap. He was rescued by this self-inhibited, late-developed kid, Sawyer. Sawyer’s handicap complements the dolphin’s (Winter’s) handicap – amputated tail and got her to start living beyond her disability. Another character, Sawyer’s cousin was injured in the Iraq war and found consolation on Sawyer’s effort to get Winter to live like a normal dolphin. Of course, the entire movie is about handicapped underdogs’ finding their life meaning and living to their full potential.

It’s a feel-good movie for someone who’s down on himself/herself due to his/her disability. Living above their disabilities and making the best of life is the best policy. Why not? Life is too short.

Movie Review: “Money Ball”

I have read Michael Lewis’ book of the same name so I’m sort of familiar with the essence of the movie, which added more characters and personality to the story main characters and made it even more interesting.

For all baseball lovers, this is a must-watch. Baseball traditionally has been a game played by big-ego, high-earning players reinforced by all the supporting characters (coaches, recruiter, and fans). The small team like Oakland Aces weren’t going to cut it with its limited budget. To win the game, it needs a new business model to win. This called for a new math wizard who crank out equations and statistics and came up with a new way to recruit cheap players who can make hits, instead of home runs or being good defensively. This broke all the traditional models known for the last 100 years, and ended up allowing Oakland Aces to win 20 consecutive games, a record. Unfortunately, at the end, Billy Beane could have gotten a fat $12M paycheck to go to Boston Red Sox. Instead, he stayed put in Oakland without a championship ring. Is it for the love of the place, dogmatic about his method? Or simply winning is not his ultimate goal – being a good underdog is as he had fallen from being a superstar right out of high school without going to Stanford as he often regretted.

Brad Pitt, acting as Billy Beane, was good and loveable in this movie, though not as believable. Like the movie anyway.

Movie Review: “The Debt”

Watched this movie on the plane. This is a thriller movie about the plot to kidnap an evil Nazi physician who performed experiments on babies. The three agents (one woman and two men) received high honor in Israel in killing the physician in an ill-fated attempt. But the truth is that the physician outsmarted them and escaped. One man’s life was destroyed (killing himself) in his desperate attempt to avoid facing his failures: one on kidnapping the physician and another one on capturing/confirming his love for the female agent, who married the more promiscuous agent because she was pregnant with his child as part of the act to trick the physician. It’s a thrill to see the chase for the physician 30 years later as before and the final struggle to do him in.

Overall, this movie kept me on my edge of my seat and kept me guessing what’s going to happen next based on the flashback hints dropped throughout the movie. The debt of hiding the truth and yet being honored as heroes was too big of a debt for the three agent to bear. Very well done. I like it.

Book Review: “Multipliers:How the Best Leaders Make Everyone Smarter” by Liz Wiseman and Greg Mckeown

It’s the battle of Multipliers vs. Diminishers, often within ourselves. This is a good read. Now I’m more equipped to see what types of leaders I’m looking at and what kind of leader I want to become.

Key concepts:
Multipliers get 2x productivity from people than Diminishers plus 5~10% more growth. “People are smart and will figure this out” vs. “They will never figure this out without me.”

Five disciplines of the Multipliers: 1. attract and optimize talent. (Talent magnet vs. empire builders) 2. create intensity that requires best thinking (liberator vs. tyrant). 3. extend challenges (vs. know-it-all). 4. Debate decisions. (debate maker vs. decision maker), 5. Instill ownership and accountability (investor – instill accountability vs. micromanager).

Common characteristics of Multipliers:
1. A Hard edge: Multipliers aren’t “feel-good” managers. They look into people and find capability, and they want to access all of it. They utilize people to their fullest. They see a lot, so they expect a lot.
2. A great sense of humor (George Clooney)
3. The accidental diminisher.

Deep dive into each of the disciplines:
1. Talent Magnet: a. Look for talent everywhere (appreciate all types of genius, ignore boundaries). b. Find people’s native genius. (look for what’s native, Label It. c. Utilize people at their fullest (connect people with opportunities, shine a spotlight). d. Remove the blockers (get rid of Prima Donnas, Get out of the way). Diminishers’ approach to managing to talent: acquire resources, put people in boxes, let talent languish. On becoming a genius watcher: 1. Identify it, 2. Test it, 3. Work it.(define 5 roles for that person)

2. Liberator: three practices: a. create space (operate consistently, level the playing field), b. demand people’s best work (defend the standard), c. generate rapid learning cycles (admit and share mistakes, insist on learning from mistakes. In contrast, Diminishers dominate the space, create anxiety, judge others. To become a Liberator: 1. play your chips (to count your interruptions), 2. label your opinions (soft vs. hard), 3. make your mistakes known (get personal, go public).

3. Challenger: 1. seed the opportunity (show the need, challenge the assumption, reframe problems, create a starting point), 2. lay down a challenge (mission impossible, extend a concrete challenge, ask the hard questions, let others fill in the blanks), 3. Generate belief (helicopter down, lay out a path, co-create the plan, orchestrate an early win. In contrast, the Diminishers’ approach to setting direction: tell what they know, test what you know, tell people how to do their jobs. To become a challenger: a. a serious case of curiosity, go extreme with questions, take a bus trip to see the real thing, take a massive baby step (en mass visibly together).

4. The Debate Maker: The decider vs. a team of rivals. a. frame the issue (define the question, form the team, assemble the data, frame the decision), b. Spark the debate (create safety for best thinking – the yin, demand rigor – the yang), c. drive a sound decision. To become a debate maker: 3 rules to share inquiry: discussion leader only asks questions, must supply support evidence to support their theories, everyone participates. Ask the hard questions, ask for the data, ask each person.

5. The Investor: a. define ownership (name the lead, give ownership for the end goal, stretch the role), b. invest resources (teach and coach, provide backup), c. Hold people accountable (give it back, expect complete work, respect natural consequences, make the scoreboard visible). On becoming an investor: 1.let them know who is the boss, 2. let nature takes its course (let it happen, talk about it, focus on next time), 3. ask for the F-I-X, 4. hand back the pen.

Lazy-way strategies: 1. work the extremes (focus your development on the two extremes – bring up your lowest low and take your highest high to the next level), 2. start with the assumption, 3. take the 30-day Multiplier challenge (pick one practice within one discipline and work it for 30 days.) To sustain momentum: 1. build it layer by layer, 2. stay with it for a year, 3. build a community.

Movie Review: “Freedom Writers”

Finally got a chance to watch this movie after sitting idle for a couple of years. A feel-good movie for my vacation.

This is a typical story of a woman English teacher (Hilary Swank) with an ambitious, idealistic enthusiasm who turned an English class of a neglected, integrated high school into a family-like camaraderie among the class members. They were the underclass fighting for survival on the street. Learning wasn’t the top of the agenda. Protecting their own kind is. Through the love of this teacher and her unusual teaching methods of field trips, writing journals, and debating, the students learned about the discrimination and the plight of Jewish people that they could relate to and the courage it took to go against the tide. Of course, all these took sacrifices from the teacher who worked multiple jobs and ended losing her marriage. Did she make an impact on most of the students? Sure she did. Was it worth it? Perhaps.

This is a good movie. There were a few movies like that before. The fact that movies are being made means in reality this kind of teacher is rare. Supporting more of the teachers who go the extra miles to help the under-privileged students is probably a better bet.

Book Review: “Dewey: The Small-Town Library Cat Who Touched the World” by Vicki Myron and Bret Witter

This book is as much about Dewey the cat as about Vicki Myron, the author’s life and family. Indeed, Dewey is a very smart cat that came with a very interesting survival story (being abandoned in a dropbox of a public library in Spencer, Iowa under a cold, blizzard condition). It helped that Dewey had an outgoing and friendly personality and knew how to read the body languages of people and took appropriate actions to gain the love and trust of people in a small town, and then eventually the world when he became famous. Of course, the author’s own life story (married to an alcoholic husband and battled many illnesses including breast cancer) is just as interesting as Dewey and draws parallelism to that of Dewey.

From the book, I came to understand a little about the typical Iowa people and their life, history, and personality. Like the corn crops they grow, the Iowa people are down to earth and take the tough life as they are. The author’s life and her mental toughness battling the tragedies (death of her two brothers, and mother) of her family and herself serves as a good example. Libraries may not seem to be a desirable community hangout place for the people, but Dewey’s presence makes the differences. People were coming to the library to read and learn and check up their favorite cat, Dewey.

This is a good book to read if you’re down on your luck and feel pity for yourself. Dewey teaches us to be significant in a small way that makes a big difference – just to be there and be a good comforter and listener. The author and many people in Spencer, Iowa and the world have been changed because of Dewey, so will many readers.

Learn by Blogging (and Sharing) – Derek Tsai's Personal Blog